In article <200212060843.gB68hmb26135@s102-n054.tele2.cz>,
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@netbsd.org> wrote:
>It appeared there is no serious objection against the sleep.
>
>To avoid commits forth and back, I propose I'd leave things
>as they are for time being, and change once a consensus
>would be in place. I'm ready to remove the sleep, of course.

Remove the sleep. What is next system call you are planning to
protect against abuse? Fixing the scheduler to cope with it is
a better way.

christos