Subject: re: Emulations as LKM (final)
To: Jarom r Dolecek <dolecek@ics.muni.cz>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/01/2000 21:23:00
I think that emulations should not depend on the code to be present.
Each should use their own version of the routines. This would not
be too hard if compat_43 code is split to individual files by
function. Emulation would pull in stuff it needs and rename
symbols with #define appropriately.
with the potential for these functions to be duplicated N times, i think
that's the wrong way to go. like normal userland libraries, we should
build up LKM libraries to avoid this duplication (which costs in wired
kernel pages).