Perry Metzger writes:

>"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> writes:
>> As all of you no-doubt know by now, Kirk *does* have certain
>> standards on how the image is used and blowtorching solaris logos or
>> sodomizing buoyant waterfowl falls well outside those standards.

>And what's wrong with a little consentual sex? I thought that
>cross-fertilization was what our community was all about! BTW, just to
>be clear: Penguins have a cloaca, and as such it isn't technically
>sodomy (ignoring the inter-species aspects).

Havent seen the shirt, but as described, it sounded distinctly
non-consensual. 

And even if it was -- does it really need to be spelled out why the
shirt, as a public, visible gesture was offensive and thoroughly inappropriate?