Paul Goyette wrote:

> >	34060-34063 == 0x850c - 0x850f  mask 0xfffc
> >	34064-34067 == 0x8510 - 0x8513  mask 0xfffc
> >	34068-34069 == 0x8514 - 0x8515  mask 0xfffe
> >

> And Chris Badura wrote:
> > Our routing table code is perfectly able to handle the first two
> > entries with a single routing table entry.

> I don't think so!

Right.  When I wrote that I was even more confused then you would
expect. :-)


-- 
Christoph Badura					www.netbsd.org

	Anything that can be done in O(N) can be done in O(N^2).
	-- Ralf Schuettau (after looking at a particular piece of code)