Ah, I went looking for something like that, but mlock(2) is not
sufficiently xref'd in the other section 2 man pages.

OK, second question, same theme: how do you mark a process such that the
scheduler will not automatically "nice +4" after the requisite amount of
CPU cycles have been consumed (aside from the obvious work-around of "nice
-1")?

	Erik <fair@clock.org>