At 21:32 -0700 5/11/99, Daniel Carosone wrote:

>Ok, that's got nothing to do with unionfs.  That's a mount option
>(that may or may not work for different fstypes?).
>
>Yes, it's silly and confusing that they're called the same thing.

Arrrgh, you're right. I had them confused (I didn't know there were two!).
In principle, it looks like I can do what I want, which is more or less:

	/dev/cd0a	/	cd9660	ro
	swap		/	mfs	rw,union,-s=16384

Except that no swap would be configured. hmmm.

	thanks,

	Erik <fair@clock.org>