Subject: Re: vague proposal for new scheduler primitive: asynchronous "sleep"
To: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>
From: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/10/1999 03:14:56
Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us> writes:
> Random questions:
> - Did I just reinvent a square wheel? (i.e., is this worthwhile at all?)
I dunno, but first of all, isn't this the same idea as `continuations'
in Mach? See:
Richard P. Draves, Brian N. Bershad, Richard F. Rashid, Randall
W. Dean. Using Continuations to Implement Thread Management and
Communication in Operating Systems. Technical Report CMU-CS-91-115,
Carnegie Mellon University, October 1991. Also appears in the
proceedings of the Thirteenth Symposium on Operating Systems(SOSP).
It also sounds somewhat similar to the scheme proposed by Matt Dillon
in
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=918313+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/1998/freebsd-current/19981213.freebsd-current>.
/assar