chuck@ccrc.wustl.edu wrote:

> >   Is there a reason why the i386 version of pmap-new is not KNF'd?  I just
> >   had a look at Chuck's resident count changes and noticed this...
> 
> >chuck doesn't like KNF.
> 
> [note this refers to me rather than Chuck S.]
> 
> while it is true that i do not like KNF, i have no problem with my code 
> in the tree being converted to KNF so that it matches everything else.
> matt volunteered to convert the UVM code to KNF and i would guess that 
> i386 pmap.new.c is just something that slipped through the cracks, so
> there is no need to get worked up about it.

As the original questioner, I'm not getting worked up at all.  My main
beef was that "diff -up" didn't work :-).  If it's a choice between good
code and funny styling, I'll take the good code any day!

Simon.