tech-kern: __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG: dead or alive?

Subject: __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG: dead or alive?
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/20/1999 16:39:45

I thought __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG was dead. Am I misreemembering?  If
it is dead, why're we getting new drivers in the tree with ifdefs for
__BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG?