| From | Subject |
| 01/08/1995 |
| matthew green | questions about deprecated parts of struct statfs. |
| Charles M. Hannum | Re: questions about deprecated parts of struct statfs. |
| 01/16/1995 |
| John Evans | Hi |
| Charles M. Hannum | Re: Hi |
| John Evans | Re: Hi |
| 01/23/1995 |
| Chuck Van Tilburg | NC2000 problems... |
| 01/24/1995 |
| Brian Buhrow | Question about tcp_iss under NetBSD 1.0, 1.0a, 0.9 and 0.9a? |
| 01/25/1995 |
| Darren Reed | Re: Question about tcp_iss under NetBSD 1.0, 1.0a, 0.9 and 0.9a? |
| Chuck Van Tilburg | Re: NC2000 problems... |
| 01/29/1995 |
| Louis A. Mamakos | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| 01/30/1995 |
| Andrew Cagney | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Andrew Cagney | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Giles Lean | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Andrew Cagney | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Chris G Demetriou | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Kevin P. Neal | Config.new |
| Chris G Demetriou | Re: Config.new |
| Chris G Demetriou | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| 01/31/1995 |
| Andrew Cagney | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Brett Lymn | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Peter Galbavy | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Greg A. Woods | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Mike Hibler | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Ted Lemon | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Greg A. Woods | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |
| Greg A. Woods | Re: Why the partitioning should stay the same |