Subject: Re: modload vs. ld/libbfd
To: Jim Wise <jwise@draga.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@beverly.kleinbus.org>
List: tech-install
Date: 04/04/2005 21:00:50
--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:36:53AM -0500, Jim Wise wrote:

> >--- base/gcc.shl.orig	2004-08-13 01:02:24.000000000 +0000
> >+++ base/gcc.shl	2005-03-30 14:55:29.000000000 +0000
> >@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
> > # $NetBSD: gcc.shl,v 1.4 2004/08/13 01:02:24 lukem Exp $
> >+./usr/lib/libbfd.so.7                              comp-c-shlib        =
    bfd
> >+./usr/lib/libbfd.so.7.0                            comp-c-shlib        =
    bfd
>                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Probably obvious, but these should become base-sys-shlib if you take=20
> this path.

What about the "bfd" part? I notice none of the other files in gcc.shl=20
uses this...

Regards,
	-is

--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCUY7iN4tiz3B8hB0RAo+WAKC09U/0XhG3aghOp1sGOT6JcLCInACeIjSx
8nZzW4QxTs16hAehWmxO+Jc=
=jYq3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--