Subject: Re: modload vs. ld/libbfd
To: <>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@netbsd.org>
List: tech-install
Date: 03/30/2005 16:50:27
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:52:32PM +0100, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> modload needs ld, currently.
>=20
> I think we should either move /usr/bin/ld and /usr/lib/libbfd.so.6 (as of=
 2.0)
> to the base set, or move modload to comp.

I was checking how to implement this, and found another problem...
/rescue/modload would need ld, too, to be of use in /rescue.

Now, I don't want to go there. But at least /bin/modload should be made
working for the time being, even if only-for-/usr-being-mounted.

	-is

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCSryyN4tiz3B8hB0RAi7YAJ4kBbT41zNer1iu/RRv5PM+M+v94gCeLdgt
WKXeqsHkhmrrLiXkcL8rf0I=
=Cdtg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9--