> My question is: is there any work in progress for solving this problem? I
> am not sure I would be satisfied with running 1.6.2 on my systems, since 2.0
> would be available to me if it was not for my choice of hardware platform.

The problem is that it needs someone with access to the failing hardware to
do some serious low-level debugging.  Until the person, hardware (and time)
get together nothing much will happen.

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk