Re: Roadblocks to further widespread adoption of NetBSD in embedded systems (at least in my neck of the woods)

To: Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Roadblocks to further widespread adoption of NetBSD in embedded systems (at least in my neck of the woods)
From: Jack Atkinson <doxalogos%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:09:26 -0500



On 3/26/2010 2:04 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:

On Mar 26, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Jack Atkinson wrote:

(listed by highest priority)
1. Official PowerQuicc support in the NetBSD tree along with drivers for CPM 
module.  (PowerPC is not quite the same, but a good starting point)

Which PowerQuicc? I, II, or III?  PQIII will be in-tree within a month or so.


PowerQuicc I (866P & 852T), PowerQuicc II, and PowerQuicc II Pro (e300 core)

References:
- Roadblocks to further widespread adoption of NetBSD in embedded systems (at least in my neck of the woods)
  - From: Jack Atkinson
- Re: Roadblocks to further widespread adoption of NetBSD in embedded systems (at least in my neck of the woods)
  - From: Matt Thomas

Prev by Date: Re: Roadblocks to further widespread adoption of NetBSD in embedded systems (at least in my neck of the woods)
Next by Date: Re: Roadblocks to further widespread adoption of NetBSD in embedded systems (at least in my neck of the woods)
Previous by Thread: Re: Roadblocks to further widespread adoption of NetBSD in embedded systems (at least in my neck of the woods)
Next by Thread: Re: Roadblocks to further widespread adoption of NetBSD in embedded systems (at least in my neck of the woods)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index