Source-Changes archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src

Quoting Hubert Feyrer <>:

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Stephen M. Rumble wrote:
Module Name:    src
Committed By:   rumble
Date:           Sat Jun 28 16:11:36 UTC 2008

Modified Files:
        src/distrib/sets/lists/base: lkm.mi
        src/sys/modules: Makefile
Added Files:
        src/sys/modules/adosfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/coda: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/coda5: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/efs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/ext2fs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/fdesc: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/ffs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/filecorefs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/hfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/kernfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/lfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/mfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/msdosfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/ntfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/nullfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/overlay: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/portal: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/procfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/ptyfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/smbfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/tmpfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/udf: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/umapfs: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/union: Makefile
        src/sys/modules/unionfs: Makefile

Log Message:
Add of bunch of file system modules.

Would it make sense to keep them in a common "fs" directory?

A flat namespace was said to be simpler. I haven't any strong opinion.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index