On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 07:01:01PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:54:05PM +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> > Hm.  0xbf0000 or 0xbfffff?  The fix joerg@ committed used the latter mask.
> 
> The latter. You want to keep the low word unmodified.

Definitely not 0x8f0000, I was wrong.  The intention of the Linux code
was not to modify a single byte, i.e., the mask 0xff8fffff?

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung@ojctech.com      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933 ext 24