Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> writes:
>> > Log Message:
>> > Be friendly to timecounter enabled architectures.
>> 
>> Please be more explicit about what you have changed and why.
>
> The change is exactly what I said -- it makes the driver work both for
> __HAVE_TIMECOUNTER and !__HAVE_TIMECOUNTER. Otherwise it is a nop.

The line you just gave -- make the driver work in both cases -- is a
pretty good explanation. Your original commit message was not nearly
as clear. I would change it to what you just posted, i.e.

"make the driver work both for __HAVE_TIMECOUNTER and !__HAVE_TIMECOUNTER"


-- 
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com