Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/libexec/httpd
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
From: Bill Stouder-Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: source-changes
Date: 10/16/2007 16:58:53
--rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:24:07AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote:
> >How about:
>=20
> How about:
>  * decide if NetBSD wants a packaging system at all
>  * either use it, or lose it.

Huh?

How do we go from adding bozohttpd to base to rejecting pkgsrc? I'm very=20
confused.

The fact that we (well I) want bozohttpd in base does not mean I think=20
poorly of pkgsrc. I adore pkgsrc. I install it on most of my machines. I=20
just feel that bozohttpd is a good fit for base.

> This is Kindergarten!
>=20
>=20
>  - Hubert
>=20
> P.S.: Of course i understand very well that decision making involves the=
=20
> management of this project, and I doubt that was involved at all in the=
=20
> case at hand. And I'm not sure what annoys[1] me more: that this was=20
> singlehandedly imported after asking around in chat, or that I'm not even=
=20
> sure if our "project management" would get their act together to show som=
e=20
> sign of leadership here.
>=20
> [1] actually, i'm utterly p*ssed off over this whole thing.

Why?

Take care,

Bill

--rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFHFVA9Wz+3JHUci9cRAgsTAJ4kb3axt+f1ztpD1/gJPCsp3Z75AgCgj9F9
cKHHJ2i91vRVbkR1yzVpSS4=
=MGiV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm--