On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:31:51 +0900 (JST)
yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:

> what's the point to limit it to laptops?
> i don't think it makes code much simpler.

This was added as is to avoid having a new framework; I used
sysmon_envsys(9) because it's related to the state that some sensors
report (from acpiacad and acpibat).

> acpibat will be a provider as well?

It should! but in this case we have to differentiate them, that's why I used
acpibat as consumer only.

> > This is what my other patch implemented, but freza convinced me to use
> > this approach for simplicity.
> 
> where was it discussed?

This was discussed between him and me privately, sorry.

Do you have any suggestion? I'd like to know what's the idea that you have
in mind. If we have a consensus about what's required and needed, I'll
implement this.

-- 
Juan Romero Pardines	- The NetBSD Project
http://plog.xtrarom.org	- NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish