On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:49:46 +0900 (JST)
yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:

> > But IMHO for this specific case the current code is much simpler and
> > shorter than this one.
> > 
> > It is possible to extend sysmon_envsys(9) with more classes and
> > abstraction if needed in the future.
> 
> sorry, what's your point?
> are you suggesting to add specific code in on-demand basis for
> each specific cases, rather than making it generic?

I'm suggesting to wait until other feature like this is necessary;
if a more generic framework is needed, I'll work on it.

And no, I won't add specific code in on-demand basis for specific cases.

A more generic solution is already there (powerres.diff)...

-- 
Juan Romero Pardines	- The NetBSD Project
http://plog.xtrarom.org	- NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish