> > yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > > do you think it could be a problem?  why?
> > 
> > Since workqueue runs the same/similar context, I would say it might be good
> > for CPU cache to bound the thread.
> 
> i guess you are assuming that workqueue_enqueue will be called on
> the same cpu on which workqueue_create is called.
> it isn't a reasonable assumption.
> 
> > If it does not need WQ_PERCPU, it would
> > not jump through CPUs.
> 
> i don't understand what you mean.
> 
> YAMAMOTO Takashi

can you fix it or should i?

YAMAMOTO Takashi