On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:51:15 +0200
Juan RP <juan@xtrarom.org> wrote:

> On Thu,  5 Jul 2007 18:44:36 +0900 (JST)
> yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> 
> > why not for indicators?
> > 
> > > Except Integer and Driver sensors, which shouldn't need that.
> > 
> > can you explain?
> 
> That should be "Integer and Drive sensors".

Erm, s/Integer/Indicator/
 
> Because I can't see any reason why these sensors should be shown when they
> are in invalid state.
> 
> Drive sensors do not rely in the state field to report if a drive is
> online or not, they use value_cur for this.
> 
> Showing Indicator sensors if they are disabled is ugly and I would like to
> not change many drivers only for this, I have explained the reason in a PR
> to Greg. A. Woods before.
> 
> If we show invalid Indicator sensors, acpiacad would report:
> 
> acpiacad0 connected
> acpiacad0 disconnected: *
> 
> and acpibat:
> 
> acpibat0 charging
> acpibat0 discharging: *
> 
> Do you really want this? I don't.

-- 
Juan Romero Pardines	- The NetBSD Project
http://plog.xtrarom.org	- NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish