On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 04:06:19 +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:

> uwe@ptc.spbu.ru wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, was there (I don't think I followed the discussion)?  We have
> > quite a number of configs (about 40) for arm, ppc, and mips ports that
> > use CPUFLAGS precisely for supplying appropriate -mfoo options as the
> > port (or the specific machine that the config targets) is known to
> > have given cpu variant.
> 
> Well, if it's the conclusion, please commit proper fixes as core.
> Our commit guidelines say "don't revert other developer's commits."

I'm confused.  It's a simple bug fix (s/COPTS/CPUFLAGS/ for original
-mfoo options), not "reverting" a commit.

SY, Uwe
-- 
uwe@ptc.spbu.ru                         |       Zu Grunde kommen
http://snark.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/          |       Ist zu Grunde gehen