On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:00:56PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > elad@NetBSD.org wrote: > > > Applied slightly different patch (u_int64_t -> uint64_t), thanks! > > Isn't u_quad_t better as defined in <sys/vnode.h> for va_size? probably not, any u_quad_t are in the line to be shot. David -- David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk