Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp> writes:
>> > Anyway, it's better to note what "62" means in the source.
>> 
>> I was giggling about this, and several other people also noted, a
>> value of 61 already means there are 2 leap-seconds. Are we going to
>> allow 3?
>
> Heh, "dt.dt_sec >= 62" rejects 62, but "dt.dt_sec > 61" is better?

No, the code doesn't mean that. >= 62 means it rejects 62 and
above. It should reject 61 and above (>= 61), permitting 60.

Perry