christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas) writes:
In article <20060415063916.9009B23402%thoreau.thistledown.com.au@localhost>,
Simon Burge <simonb%wasabisystems.com@localhost> wrote:
Brett Lymn wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: blymn
Date: Fri Apr 14 13:09:07 UTC 2006
...
src/sys/sys: iostat.h
The new "struct io_stats" has members like:
char *name; /* device name */
void *parent; /* pointer to what we are
attached to */
int type; /* type of device the state belong
to */
int busy; /* busy counter */
Should these names have io_ prefixes? The current names are a bit
"generic", and could cause issues in code that includes <sys/
iostat.h>.
They should. Let's do it.
Er, we live in an age of modern compilers -- the namespace inside
structs is struct specific. Why do struct members need prefixes like
io_?