On Mar 16, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Jason Thorpe wrote:

>
> On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:06 PM, Jim Wise wrote:
>
>> Yes, that sort of goes without saying.
>>
>> I've stated pretty clearly why I think this is the case,
>
> Then you should have not removed the code, no matter what you think  
> of it.  Instead, you should have discussed it, at least, and if it  
> was controversial, gotten the nod from Core first.
>
> For someone who is suck

Sorry, "such"... it's been a long day...

> a stickler for procedure during board elections, it's a little  
> surprising to see you take this position on this issue.
>
> -- thorpej

-- thorpej