On 23-Feb-06, at 3:47 PM, Tim Rightnour wrote:

>
> On 23-Feb-2006 Jason Thorpe wrote:
>> What's wrong with autri specifically matching only the device class
>> it cares about?
>
> I'm ok with that.. but does anyone know for sure what class of  
> device the autri
> claims to be?   I don't have one.. so I'm not sure..
>
> If someone can tell me the class, my plan would be to change autri  
> to return 1
> if found, 2 if found and class is correct,  and have if_pcn return  
> 2 if it
> finds one and the class is network.

This might not be a big deal, but I'd just like to point out that in  
the event that someone boots a kernel that includes the autri driver  
but not the pcn driver, with this solution the autri driver will  
still try to attach.

I wouldn't expect this to cause any major problems.. just thought I'd  
mention it incase someone thinks otherwise.

Cheers,
Jared