YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> you need major bump as pw_policy_test is incompatible.
> i think it's better to keep it compatible and use a differnt name for new one.

the API was unused exactly for the purpose of changing it (look at the
original pw_policy commit message from few months ago). i can do that
a major bump, but i don't like the idea of keeping the same
pw_policy_test as it was.

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat