YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> i thought i suggested "near defcorename".  ie. resourcevar.h
> i'm not sure if it's the best place, but it's better than sysctl.h, at least.
> 
> i don't think security.h is a good idea, for the same reason as
> sysctl "security" top level node.

how about instead of splitting one XXX'd block across two files we'll
just wait until we have a place we know we want to keep it there and
only then move it?

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat