On Dec 13,  7:42am, thorpej@shagadelic.org (Jason Thorpe) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/acpi

| 
| On Dec 12, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| 
| > You mean MI code? MachDep is just that. In this particular case,  
| > not every
| > machine has ACPI. To compare, how about a machine that has  
| > turbochannel and
| > needs a sysctl? I think that the precedence is hw.*, right?
| 
| Where do other devices get inserted into the tree?

hw.<device-instance>.<prop>
 
| Anyway, I think hw.acpi.root might be OK.  Would allow for other ACPI  
| nodes to be added later.


Yes, hw.acpi.root sounds ok for now.

christos