On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 12:32:46PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <200509210846.KAA0000153688@zel459.zel.kfa-juelich.de>,
> Matthias Drochner  <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de> wrote:
> >
> >While we are here:
> >The default "nofiles" soft limit (64) is too small
> >to run "ethereal". (Caused appearently bu a recent
> >ethereal change to pull in a number of decoding
> >tables for radius... doesn't look well written, but
> >anyway...)
> >How about raising this limit as well?
> >(I actually don't know where the knob is.)
> 
> How about adding some close() calls to the radius package?
> 

64 is general is a fairly low default though. 256 would be better.

James