Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/alpha/alpha

[YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost>]

> >> > I have the impression that the VM_FAULT_INVALID and
> >> > VM_FAULT_PROTECT flags are not used anywhere and
> >> > can be removed completely.
> >> 
> >> Well, a grep and test-compile says otherwise:
> >
> >i think what he meant is that there is no point to distinguish them.
> >
> >as it seems that there are some code to rely on uvm-internal decls
> >(eg. uvm_fault_wire), i put back uvm_fault.h for now.
> >
> >YAMAMOTO Takashi
> >
> Aren't those needed for:
> 
> /* SIGSEGV */
> #define SEGV_MAPERR     1       /* Address not mapped to object         */
> #define SEGV_ACCERR     2       /* Invalid permissions for mapped object*/
> 
> /* SIGBUS */
> #define BUS_ADRALN      1       /* Invalid address alignment            */
> #define BUS_ADRERR      2       /* Non-existent physical address        */
> #define BUS_OBJERR      3       /* Object specific hardware error       */

i don't think they are relevant.

YAMAMOTO Takashi