On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Daniel Carosone wrote:

> I *think* due to this change, LFS seems to be taking inordinately more
> CPU (sys) time than when I was running tests last night.

Hm, that's possible...that patch appears to be suboptimal, though without 
it my test box wedges within a few minutes of multiple simultaneous "tar | 
tar".  chs dislikes the patch for another reason, and he and I are talking 
about how the situation might be improved.  Stay tuned :^)

 						Konrad Schroder
 						perseant@hhhh.org