On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:11:25AM -0600, James Chacon wrote:
> Except it isn't 2.0.2. It has changes not in the 2.0.x branch.

Yes, I know. But it is *much* closed to 2.0.2_BETA than to 2.0_BETA.

> Labelling it as anything associated with the 2.0.x branch is just
> wrong since it has a larger superset of those changes which may/may
> not be completely the same.

Labelling it as a beta of the 2.0 release is even worse.

	Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                  http://scheler.de/~matthias/