-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Jason Thorpe wrote:

>> Given this, I don't think we should place unnecessary burdens (such as
>> ``you may not use ssh2'') in such users' paths, as long as in avoiding
>> such burdens we don't harm users who aren't using krb4.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>
> What's the issue?  Acquire a krb5 ticket for SSH, 5-to-4 it for AFS.

Okay.

I guess I was thinking there might be users who were caught in corporate 
(or university) environments where krb4 was still the de facto standard
who would lose.  But as you pointed out, they were already not able to 
use sshv2, so this isn't a change.

Thanks,
- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCI+l+pRpI6SYACmIRAhB2AJ9O/SBpAADQGD1AT04DzhGW0AuacQCfduks
yIQ+6CQ9fkAo2FhMhhrjuIM=
=7C0y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----