On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 04:08:32PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote: | | On Jan 11, 2005, at 1:29 PM, Luke Mewburn wrote: | | >I am not sure that MKPAM should be set to "yes" at this time, given | >that <manu> set MKPAM=no after discussion with a few of us, at least | >until we knew that the PAM integration was stable enough to use. | > | >I.e, I think this change should be backed out. | >(Or all of rev 1.431 removed) | | MKPAM should be set to "yes". USE_PAM should be set to "no". That makes sense. I'll do that.
Attachment:
pgpQKG8X67Yx6.pgp
Description: PGP signature