On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 07:19:01PM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
> At 07:11 PM 6/5/2004, James Chacon wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 02:28:58AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> >>
> >>    Michael L. Hitch wrote:
> >>    >
> >>    > Module Name:     src
> >>    > Committed By:    mhitch
> >>    > Date:            Tue Jun  1 02:25:09 UTC 2004
> >>    >
> >>    > Added Files:
> >>    >  src/sys/arch/amiga/stand/misc: Makefile device-streams.tar.gz.uue
> >>    >      loadbsd-2.14.gz.uue loadbsd-2.14.uue loadbsd-2.16.gz.uue
> >>    >      loadbsd.gz.uue loadbsd.uue rdbinfo.gz.uue rdbinfo.uue
> >>    >      runbootblock.README runbootblock.uue xstreamtodev.gz.uue
> >>    >      xstreamtodev.uue
> >>    >
> >>    > Log Message:
> >>    > Add AmigaDOS tools for the amiga, which end up in the 
> >"installation/misc"
> >>    > directory of the release tree.
> >>
> >>    These should go under src/distrib, I think.
> >>
> >> i don't think so.  their sources are in sys/arch/amiga/stand and
> >> like all the other platforms that have bootblocks built on other
> >> systems, they're checked into sys not distrib.
> >>
> >
> >Actually if they're just used/decoded/etc under a make release (ala sets)
> >I disagree then. Bootblocks aren't the same thing as uuencoded binaries you
> >can only use on the native box to bootstrap an install. Those are clearly
> >distrib tools.
> 
> It they go in the release sets (aka DESTDIR), they don't go into
> distrib.  (since distrib is not descended into for a distribution
> build).
> 

These wouldn't. "Amigados tools which end up in installation/misc". Clearly
a RELEASEDIR only type thing so (to me) a distrib item.

James