At 07:11 PM 6/5/2004, James Chacon wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 02:28:58AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> >
> >    Michael L. Hitch wrote:
> >    >
> >    > Module Name:     src
> >    > Committed By:    mhitch
> >    > Date:            Tue Jun  1 02:25:09 UTC 2004
> >    >
> >    > Added Files:
> >    >  src/sys/arch/amiga/stand/misc: Makefile device-streams.tar.gz.uue
> >    >      loadbsd-2.14.gz.uue loadbsd-2.14.uue loadbsd-2.16.gz.uue
> >    >      loadbsd.gz.uue loadbsd.uue rdbinfo.gz.uue rdbinfo.uue
> >    >      runbootblock.README runbootblock.uue xstreamtodev.gz.uue
> >    >      xstreamtodev.uue
> >    >
> >    > Log Message:
> >    > Add AmigaDOS tools for the amiga, which end up in the 
> "installation/misc"
> >    > directory of the release tree.
> >
> >    These should go under src/distrib, I think.
> >
> > i don't think so.  their sources are in sys/arch/amiga/stand and
> > like all the other platforms that have bootblocks built on other
> > systems, they're checked into sys not distrib.
> >
>
>Actually if they're just used/decoded/etc under a make release (ala sets)
>I disagree then. Bootblocks aren't the same thing as uuencoded binaries you
>can only use on the native box to bootstrap an install. Those are clearly
>distrib tools.

It they go in the release sets (aka DESTDIR), they don't go into
distrib.  (since distrib is not descended into for a distribution
build).


-- 
Matt Thomas                     email: matt@3am-software.com
3am Software Foundry              www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA              disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.