Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org> wrote:

> Uhm, why?

For the sake of completeness.
 
> You're assuming that when someone runs mknod in Darwin emulation that they
> really want a NetBSD device node. That sounds rather suspicious to me. If
> you want a NetBSD node, just run NetBSD's mknod.

I understand your point of view, but if I don't convert it, a Darwin
binary will have an inconsistent view of devices between stat(2) and
mknod(2). I don't know what is worst.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent 
le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas.
manu@netbsd.org