Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys
To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: source-changes
Date: 08/22/2003 14:07:17
>
>	no, i objected of passing struct in6pcb * as the argument, i suggested
>	struct socket * as explicit argument.  why did you commit it ignoring
>	my comment?  i'll change them to pass struct socket *.


And I replied that such a change would need a consensus with Sam
Leffer. To do what you want we would also have to change fast-ipsec to
accept a struct socket* rather than the struct inpcb* it is passed
now.  I also said that we will revisit the inpcb*/inpcb6* issue, after
hooks to fit into fast-ipsec existed for review, and both approaches
could be compard.

Can you please defer chagne the inpcb6* to an struct socket*, until
after that review?