On Wednesday, 13 August 2003 at 23:12:28 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > > Jonathan Stone <jonathan%DSG.Stanford.EDU@localhost> writes: >>> True enough, but if you're doing a "Traditional BSD" overlapping copy >>> you use ovbcopy... not that either should be done any longer... >> >> Exactly why I changed it to use ovbcopy(). >> >> Unless someone else wants to maintain netipsec (and opencrypto): me, >> I'd sooner keep using the compat macros for netipsec, and keep >> our code in synch with Sam Leffler's code, thanks all the same. >> Pointless code-thrash is ... well, pointless. > > It might be a good idea to encourage the FreeBSD people to do the same > thing we've done (i.e. move to the mem* functions, which among other > things are nicely inlined by gcc). Indeed. I'm taking notes :-) Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers
Attachment:
pgpi2tm3Y4tht.pgp
Description: PGP signature