Subject: re: CVS commit: src/crypto/dist/openssl
To: None <itojun@netbsd.org>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: source-changes
Date: 07/15/2003 03:06:30
   
   Modified Files:
   	src/crypto/dist/openssl: e_os2.h
   	src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto: symhacks.h
   	src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/bio: bio.h
   	src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/bn: bn.h
   	src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/des: des.h
   	src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/pem: pem.h
   	src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/pkcs7: pkcs7.h
   	src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/rand: rand.h
   	src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/x509: x509.h x509_vfy.h
   	src/crypto/dist/openssl/ssl: ssl.h ssl3.h
   
   Log Message:
   unifdef VMS/WIN16/WIN32 in public headers, at least


is this actually necessary?  "dist" sources should not be changed
to be less portable for no reason...  the only real change i can
see this makes is making it harder for future openssl updates due
to unnecessary conflicts....



.mrg.