Re: CVS commit: src/crypto/dist/openssl

[itojun%iijlab.net@localhost]

>   Modified Files:
>       src/crypto/dist/openssl: e_os2.h
>       src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto: symhacks.h
>       src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/bio: bio.h
>       src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/bn: bn.h
>       src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/des: des.h
>       src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/pem: pem.h
>       src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/pkcs7: pkcs7.h
>       src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/rand: rand.h
>       src/crypto/dist/openssl/crypto/x509: x509.h x509_vfy.h
>       src/crypto/dist/openssl/ssl: ssl.h ssl3.h
>   
>   Log Message:
>   unifdef VMS/WIN16/WIN32 in public headers, at least
>
>
>is this actually necessary?  "dist" sources should not be changed
>to be less portable for no reason...  the only real change i can
>see this makes is making it harder for future openssl updates due
>to unnecessary conflicts....

        header files shouldn't have #ifdef which easily conflict with what user
        would define by chance.  there's no portability issue, we won't and
        shouldn't use the removed prototypes (and whatever) anyways.

itojun