In article <20030712114707.44FAAB004@cvs.netbsd.org>
yamt@netbsd.org wrote:

> (this shouldn't cause a real problem since if superblock is valid,
> LFS_SBPAD-sizeof(struct dlfs) bytes after it is always zero-filled, though)

I guess fsck_lfs(8) fills it zero but newfs_lfs(8) doesn't.
I saw the case fs->lfs_seglock is not zero in lfs.c:lfs_init()
right after newfs_lfs(8).
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp