On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 14:16:28 -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> > > I think the intent before was to deliberately break such arches and
> > > force them to make pthreads work.
> > 
> > This intent is not communicated -
> 
> Jason has said this several times on multiple lists including
> source-changes, though.

If that's the intent, then someone in the know please back out my
change, reword the WARNING to reflect it and add an explicit @false
instead of causing make(1) to fail with an unrelated error.

I have mixed feelings about such a "coercive breakage" approach.
E.g. as far as I know SA are broken for SMP machines, yet one can
compile a MULTIPROCESSOR kernel.  At the very least, I'd move the
nagging breakage to lib/libpthread.

PS: My intent here is to deliberately fix such arches and force Jason to
make his intent explicit (if that's what he indened in the first
place).  ;-)

SY, Uwe
-- 
uwe@ptc.spbu.ru                         |       Zu Grunde kommen
http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/            |       Ist zu Grunde gehen