In message <20020801094033.675494B22@coconut.itojun.org>
	on Thu, 01 Aug 2002 18:40:33 +0900,
	itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> >> 	i committed it as the problem will re-appear with gcc 3.1.1, i guess.
> >Oh, boy!  gcc has revived its bug!?
> 
> 	see http://www.jp.netbsd.org/ja/JP/ml/port-powerpc-ja/200207/msg00029.html
> 	and the thread follows.  gcc 3.1.1 will take advantage of ANSI pointer
> 	aliasing rules, and we have to use unions to be -O2 safe.
Thanks much.

Hmmm, standards make things complex...

-- 
Takahiro Kambe <taca@sky.yamashina.kyoto.jp>