On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 09:30:06PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
  | In article <20020506221551.A2437@wasabisystems.com>
  | lukem@wasabisystems.com wrote:
  | 
  | >   | > Replace <dev/sun/sun_boot.h> with <sys/bootinfo.h>, which is intended
  | >   | > to be more generic than ``bbinfo definitions for Sun-based systems''.
  | >   | 
  | >   | Is the name of `bootinfo.h' appropriate for this?
  | > 
  | > bootinfo.h? bootblock.h? bbinfo.h?  it's a hard call...
  | > do you feel something like <sys/bootblock.h> more appropriate? 
  | 
  | Well, I don't have any particular idea for the name
  | (bootblock.h seems better than bootinfo.h or bbinfo.h anyway),
  | but <sys/bootinfo.h> would cause some confusion because
  | some ports already have <machine/bootinfo.h> for other purpose.

good point.  i thought i checked for that potential conflict, but
obviously not :(

i'll rename it to sys/bootblock.h

luke.