-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:

>>>XXX pkg name correct?
>>Yup :-)
>>However, if these .a files and shlib symlinks are only used for
>>compiling rune support into applications, they should move from
>>base-runemodule-* to comp-runemodule-* (in comp/{shl.,}mi...
>
>	see, will do.  do we really want to split base-runemodule-*?
>	isn't it too fine-grained?

Not sure.  My assumption is that most users won't be using more than one
or two rune modules on a given system, and may want to trim a little
(especially on ports such as the hpc ports, where space can be
crucial...

Thoughts?

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6d9wD2JhG4/qi8rQRAgENAJ4w0K8e6+p8211AMOndzRKWL1nfDQCgr7ZY
1kX1dPT+7CR8y66T8ZxdvCY=
=GLXt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----