>: A note to that effect might be a good idea (such as `includes all
>: devices from $FreeBSD$'.)  Usually just bringing in imprivements isn't
>: enough to warrant the tag apart, so confusion might result otherwise (`I
>: brought over a later version than that said it was from, so why did some
>: devices disappear...').
>OK.  I'll change it to
>/* Syncronized through FreeBSD v 1.8 */
>would that be acceptible?

	(sorry i'm not up-to-date about FreeBSD pcmcia support)
	if FreeBSD pcmciadevs now follows NetBSD pcmciadevs file format,
	why not put $NetBSD$ in FreeBSD pcmciadevs file?  i don't think it
	useful to put revision number in both.

itojun